Loading Now

U.S. and Argentina’s Withdrawal Intentions from the WHO

The United States expressed its intention to withdraw from the WHO under Donald Trump, citing biases towards China and ineffective use of funds. The Biden administration halted this exit plan. Recently, Argentina announced similar intentions, with President Milei criticizing the WHO’s management of health issues like COVID-19. Both countries reflect significant dissatisfaction with the WHO’s approach to global health governance.

The United States, the largest financial backer of the World Health Organization (WHO), signaled its intention to withdraw on January 20, 2017, coinciding with Donald Trump’s inauguration. In 2020, his administration formally informed the United Nations of its decision, alleging biases toward China and criticizing the WHO for being insufficiently stringent in its response to the COVID-19 pandemic. It expressed concerns that American funds were not being allocated effectively within the organization.

However, discussions regarding withdrawal were curtailed when President Biden took office, choosing not to proceed with the exit strategy. Meanwhile, Trump continues to maintain his original position against the WHO. Recently, Javier Milei of Argentina, considered an ally of Trump, announced on February 5 that Argentina intends to withdraw from the organization, citing fundamental disagreements over the WHO’s management of health crises, particularly concerning COVID-19.

Manuel Adorni, Milei’s spokesperson, articulated that additional concerns included the WHO’s lack of autonomy from the influence of other nations, which was noted as a significant issue in their withdrawal consideration. These recent developments indicate a growing discontent among certain countries regarding the WHO’s effectiveness and political impartiality in global health governance.

The World Health Organization (WHO) has long been a central player in global health policy, receiving substantial funding from member nations, particularly the United States. Historically, the United States has held a significant role in shaping the organization’s policies and strategies. Recent political tensions and criticisms of the WHO’s management during the COVID-19 pandemic have prompted discussions regarding withdrawal from the organization by the US and Argentina, reflecting a broader sentiment towards perceived inefficacy and political bias.

In summary, the intention of the United States and Argentina to withdraw from the World Health Organization stems from longstanding frustrations regarding perceived inefficiencies and political biases associated with the organization. As leaders like Donald Trump and Javier Milei express their discontent, the global health landscape may witness shifts in funding and collaboration, further shaping the future of international public health responses.

Original Source: globalsouthworld.com

Michael Grant has dedicated his life to journalism, beginning his journey as an editorial intern in a small-town newspaper. Over the past two decades, he has honed his skills in investigative reporting and breaking news coverage. His relentless pursuit of the truth has earned him multiple awards, and his articles are known for their clarity and depth. Michael currently contributes regularly to several prominent news websites, where his expertise is sought after by editors and readers alike.

Post Comment