Tentative Agreement Between Syrian Forces Signals Potential U.S. Troop Withdrawal

The Syrian Democratic Forces and the Syrian government reached a preliminary agreement to reunite peacefully, likely facilitated by U.S. diplomacy. This accord could pave the way for a U.S. troop withdrawal from Syria, marking a significant diplomatic achievement. However, challenges such as ongoing violence and minority rights present potential obstacles.

Recent developments indicate that Syrian Kurdish rebels and the Syrian government have reached a tentative agreement to peacefully reunite, potentially facilitated by U.S. military diplomacy. The agreement involves Kurdish rebel leader Gen. Mazloum Abdi and Syrian President Ahmad al-Sharaa establishing a framework for the integration of the Syrian Democratic Forces (SDF) into the new government, with promises to recognize Kurdish rights. A newly formed committee will finalize details by the end of 2025.

This agreement arises amidst a desire from Syria’s war-weary factions to end ongoing violence in their country. Sources reveal that the U.S. played a significant role in the negotiations, which included American mediators. Notably, Abdi’s arrival in Damascus aboard a U.S. military helicopter underscored this involvement, further highlighted by General Michael Kurilla’s previous engagement with SDF leaders in Syria.

President Donald Trump has consistently advocated for the withdrawal of U.S. troops from Syria. Past attempts have met with challenges, notably in October 2019, when a subsequent Turkish offensive followed Trump’s announcement. Currently, the SDF and the central government’s agreement might present a diplomatic pathway for U.S. troop withdrawal, reportedly initiated by Trump’s directive.

U.S. Secretary of State Marco Rubio expressed support for the alliance, citing it as a step towards a unified Syria. However, critical issues remain, such as the recent violence against Alawite Muslims and how it may influence both parties’ willingness to cooperate. Despite claims of rogue actions within the government, any escalation of violence could threaten Kurdish stability.

Both the Syrian government and the SDF face external threats from neighboring nations, necessitating a stable relationship to avoid renewed conflict. The synchronization of the SDF’s negotiations with a Turkish-Kurdish peace process signals significant geopolitical shift, reinforced by recent endorsements from Turkish officials.

Celebrations following the agreement from both government and SDF supporters indicate a shared desire for unity; however, concerns persist regarding the future control of resources like oil and the return of displaced peoples. Critics, including Syrian journalist Hussam Hammoud, caution that persistent armed factions may lead to instability despite the provisional agreement

The deal raises questions regarding the status of Kurdish female fighters, where assertions of women’s rights remain inadequately addressed. Furthermore, the Syriac Union Party warns that the deal does not adequately acknowledge the rights of non-Kurdish minorities who supported the SDF.

As the newly proposed constitution comes into play, tensions may rise when the SDF rejects components perceived as undemocratic. However, the landmark Sharaa-Abdi agreement restores the power of resolution to Syrian hands. Despite ongoing U.S. military presence, Trump has distanced himself, declaring the complexity of Syrian politics as a matter for Syrians to resolve.

The recent agreement between Syrian Kurdish forces and the Syrian government, facilitated by U.S. diplomacy, indicates a potential pathway to peace and the withdrawal of U.S. troops from Syria. While the agreement aims for the integration of Kurdish forces and recognition of their rights, substantial challenges remain, including potential violence against minorities and civil unrest. Moreover, the broader implications of this agreement for Kurdish autonomy and empowerment, particularly women’s rights, remain critical considerations as both factions proceed with this tentative partnership.

Original Source: reason.com