Sudan’s Civil War: Military Shifts and Humanitarian Crisis

Sudan’s civil war may be reaching a turning point as the Sudanese army regains control from the RSF, recently capturing the presidential palace in Khartoum. Despite military advances, humanitarian conditions remain dire with international aid falling short. The conflict has far-reaching effects, including escalating tensions in neighboring South Sudan, emphasizing the urgent need for a comprehensive international response.

Recent developments indicate a potential turning point in Sudan’s ongoing civil war, which has persisted despite international diplomatic efforts. Forces loyal to General Abdel Fattah al-Burhan have successfully regained control of the presidential palace in Khartoum from the Rapid Support Forces (RSF), led by General Mohamed Hamdan Dagalo, known as Hemedti. Initially, the RSF’s early assaults captured significant locations within the capital; however, the Sudanese army has since recaptured these landmarks, including the palace which symbolizes Sudanese sovereignty.

Following their recent victories, the Sudanese army has advanced to reclaim the central bank, while residents report increased shelling in areas like Omdurman. Burhan’s forces attribute their regained strength to better supply lines and newly acquired Iranian and Turkish drones. A military spokesperson heralded the capture of the presidential palace as a triumph for the Sudanese nation.

The civil war has resulted in numerous atrocities by both factions, with rights organizations condemning the actions of the RSF, particularly in the Darfur region. Increased sanctions from the previous U.S. administration aimed at Hemedti reflect growing concerns over the violence and humanitarian crisis. Amidst the conflict, aid delivery remains complicated due to the ongoing violence and territorial disputes among various militia groups.

The RSF reportedly receives indirect support from the UAE and Russia, while the Sudanese military has backing from Egypt, Turkey, and Iran. Efforts for peace have failed repeatedly, with temporary ceasefires often violated soon after they are established. The RSF continues to hold significant control in western and southwestern regions of Sudan, posing a challenge to Burhan’s forces. Recently, the RSF convened to discuss forming a parallel government in territories under their influence.

The broader repercussions of the Sudanese crisis extend into South Sudan, exacerbating tensions in its fragile governance structure. Violence has surged and foreign agencies are evacuating staff, prompting warnings of a looming civil war, largely fueled by the impacts of the conflict next door. Despite urgent humanitarian crises, international response remains inadequate, with the U.N.’s funding efforts grossly underperforming.

Furthermore, significant cuts to U.S. foreign assistance have exacerbated humanitarian challenges in Sudan. Local organizations are raising alarms regarding increasing poverty and diminishing health services. Observers urge attention to the dire humanitarian needs, noting that the U.S. was a leading donor before aid reductions jeopardized crucial support systems. Attention shifts towards conflicts elsewhere, detracting necessary resources from the humanitarian response in Sudan.

In conclusion, while the Sudanese army has shown recent military successes against the RSF, the long-term resolution of the conflict remains elusive. Both sides have inflicted severe humanitarian consequences, exacerbated by international neglect and underfunded assistance efforts. The potential for further escalation in South Sudan due to this turmoil underscores the need for renewed international focus and support for the affected populations. The growing crisis emphasizes the critical condition of humanitarian needs in the region, demanding urgent attention and action from global leaders.

Original Source: www.washingtonpost.com